Jump to content
You missed one vital point...
"It proves to the world that we don't have a bunch of right wing wackos running things."
Oops, we do. (read the posts pre and post your comment.)
No matter how hard I try, I just CAN'T not contribute.
Or even just check the definition of the English word "fact." Most of your "facts" are actually subjective rants.
I used to find your posts humorous. I've gotten past that and more to the "fact," I find that other posters feel the need to reply humorous.
Please, you could save yourself a lot of ridicule and the community a lot of angst if you would just post your rants as opinions, and your facts as facts.
Not just my 2cents this time, but mostly facts.
Fact: Any phrase with "should" included in its contents is NOT a "fact."
Fact: Unless you were in the Commissioners' office, observing their activities throughout the entire day, "Commissioners were busy making campaign calls that day!!!", cannot be a "fact."
Not necessarily a fact,
just my 2cents,
That was a refreshing message.
See: You don't have to be better than they to be a Christian. You don't have to bombast others to make yourself better. Just letting others in on how they can be better people is so much easier to swallow than belittling those who (whom?) don't agree with your thoughts.
After what I've just read, that was a refreshing chuckle, and it felt good.
Thancs for corectin me i dint intent that I was perfec laik i sad bfor. but Ifn in 2 posts that was mor den 3400 wurds,(creg daly press spel chek tole me that), you found one mistak, I ken live wit dat. I em aware of the rule of grammer that if it ken be ansered with him or her, it should be "hoom" but if it shud be anserred wit he or she it should be "hoo" . i gess im not no beter den sumwon elce.uups, i gofed!! lik i sed, i aints perfekt, but et leest i got a hi skool edukashon.
Let's not throw stones when we live in glass houses. And, yes! I realize there are probably a few typos in this too, (or should I say also?), I'm not criticizing you personally. I'm just saying with the lack of education you regularly display here, you ought to rethink what or who you criticize.
As you all know,
this is my 2cents.
To the majority of the posters here:
In general, I want to clarify that this is NOT a personal attack on any one individual poster here. It IS a commentary on the education, or lack thereof, of the general public residing in Craig, or at least reading the local paper. It is also a commentary on the ignorant, subjective nature of most posts presented here, in that we all think: "We got it right! It's the rest of the community that has their head in that damp dark place." And that exactly is what frustrates me when I read the commentary posted here. I often read through what I hope are typos, and misstatements that were written in haste. Oft times I err grammatically in my haste. Be it due to rage, haste, just plain arrogance, (Yeah, now and again I've been accused of it.) But I must address this response to:
It's nice that you can spell necessary. But as I was reading through your post about how important the 3 R's are, I couldn't help but notice either you haven't made it through 4th grade, or ignored everything they taught you since. With all its recommended corrections, it took almost as long for MSWord to get through your post, as it did me to try to read it coherently with all the misspellings and incorrect punctuation. I am not just being critical, but if you're going to criticize the lack of education that our students are receiving, at least you could spell receive correctly.
Thier is actually spelled T-H-E-I-R. It was misspelled 5 times that I caught. Obviously not a typo.
Each time you referred to "...just that extracurricular activities..." you failed to punctuate with a comma; semi-colon; or colon, (either of which would be a grammatically correct option), to separate what you were trying to say from what was quoted. IE: "...just that, extracurricular activities.", or: "...just that: "Extracurricular activities."
Are you aware that there are three ways to spell the English word that sounds like 2? Further there are three different uses of that word: To; too; or two. If there are too many people that don't know grammar, that would be the word T-O-O. But if those people went T-O school in Moffat County they might not know that that wouldn't be spelled the same as the number T-W-O. Which of those two are you?
While I will agree that the welfare system that we have to endure in this country, state, county and city is a sham, I think Marie Peer would take offense at you calling welfare a role. She, nor the fine group of people she heads up are acting, or playing a role. It is a roll, as in roll call, not a role as in one acted by the posters here.
I could probably go on, but I only hope my point is noted:
Sir or Madam,
As was suggested, (not necessarily agreed with-but this IS Craig, Amerika), in other posts on this subject: It appears the best way to deal with, or content oneself living in the community, given our law enforcement strategists is to "Get over it and move on."
If you think their strategy is a bit misdirected, YOU may be their next candidate.
Just because you call yourself "anonymous" don't think they don't have your IP Address- once an IP address is known, most likely a physical address is known, once a physical address is known a name is known, once a name is known a license plate number is known, once a license plate number is known, ... well we know what happens then, don't we?
By the way, this isn't posted as "justfacts" this is
and I don't live there so na-ny-na-ny naaa naaaa.
That doesn't mean they can't find me, I'm betting they do, but that could be just my paranoia surfacing. Which brings up another thought... If fears or anticipations are founded on experience, is it paranoia?
Has ANYone following this thread figured out yet why I was singled out for a rebuttal to a comment that I never made?
I'm still trying to find reason, but as with most posts I read I'm coming up empty.
Any who know me, or know of me, know I'm willing to, and I HAVE posted apologies and THANKS for correcting entries. But I'm really having a hard time with this one finding how I f!@#$d up a comment or misrepresented ANYone in this thread.
Any input would be helpful toward my posts into the future. Because despite my desire to NOT post and become part of the soap opera that IS Craig, ... I just can't help myself.
Last login: Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2013 Craig Daily Press. All rights reserved.