Actually, narrow-mindedness and an overwhelming amount of common blather is more of a black eye on a community than a guy that shot a few starving elk.
So, DOW had the resources to station agents to spy from a snow fort to try and catch Culverwell doing something wrong ( they didn't ) but couldn't find the resources to help him do something right?
What is sad it that this presidential election has become like the voting process on American Idol. That is how it has been packaged for sale if you watch the news, read the papers or look around the internet. “Cast your vote for the Song and Dance Man that can talk pretty or vote for the Wise Old Story Teller with a chip on his shoulder.” These are our finalist to pick from according to the Media. I don't see Obama / Biden running the country should they get elected. I see Obama and Pelosi running our country and it scares me. Back to fighting for gun ownership and Political Correctness running amuck again. Being pushed to be in step with Europe's thinking instead of them being in step with us. I know it's been 8 years since we had to deal with those items much but I don't want to return to that era again. There has to be a balance of power without any single political party running our government. We've seen what occurs when that happens. When the campaign promises fade and the feel good speeches fall to reality, that's when you see who we elected.
If the DOW does operate on funds from hunting licenses, isn't it possible to view them as a business as well? A business with their own responsibilities? A legal matter I am sure.
Huntenmomma, If you “knew for a fact” of this beforehand, why are you just now volunteering information in a public forum? You may have prevented this whole situation. Aren't you sure that the first 4 words of your last post were probably the most accurate?
A good attorney will provide the best legal council possible whether the attorney is “High $$” or not. The actions of a man defending what is his and making no attempt to hide it in a situation such as this speaks for a lot of people in many different ways.. I doubt all the facts have been presented to the public and most have learned not to judge without all facts. It is amazing how many people claim to know what is legal and what isn't and who should pay and who shouldn't without knowing all the facts and delegated responsibilities.. We are all intitled to our opinions as well as being innocent until the end of the trial.
How many starving animals should a rancher feed? One, One Hundred. Maybe a Thousand or so? Some areas get more Elk coming thru than others. Who sets the amount? When do you stop or start? What is the “Right thing to do”? Is someone just as responsible for letting them starve? Is there any guilt? Is there any responsibility? This is what trials are for. Not just for the accused but for the accuser as well. People are innocent unless they are proven guilty. The same rule applies to all of us.
or the latest version of Internet Explorer
26 November 2008
at 8:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tencman (Anonymous) says…
Actually, narrow-mindedness and an overwhelming amount of common blather is more of a black eye on a community than a guy that shot a few starving elk.
23 November 2008
at 8:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tencman (Anonymous) says…
So, DOW had the resources to station agents to spy from a snow fort to try and catch Culverwell doing something wrong ( they didn't ) but couldn't find the resources to help him do something right?
10 October 2008
at 4:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tencman (Anonymous) says…
What is sad it that this presidential election has become like the voting process on American Idol. That is how it has been packaged for sale if you watch the news, read the papers or look around the internet. “Cast your vote for the Song and Dance Man that can talk pretty or vote for the Wise Old Story Teller with a chip on his shoulder.” These are our finalist to pick from according to the Media. I don't see Obama / Biden running the country should they get elected. I see Obama and Pelosi running our country and it scares me. Back to fighting for gun ownership and Political Correctness running amuck again. Being pushed to be in step with Europe's thinking instead of them being in step with us. I know it's been 8 years since we had to deal with those items much but I don't want to return to that era again. There has to be a balance of power without any single political party running our government. We've seen what occurs when that happens. When the campaign promises fade and the feel good speeches fall to reality, that's when you see who we elected.
9 September 2008
at 3:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tencman (Anonymous) says…
Defiance.
The inability to produce meaningful dialog can be due to a genetic breakdown of your own but your spelling is spot on.
.
9 September 2008
at 12:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tencman (Anonymous) says…
If the DOW does operate on funds from hunting licenses, isn't it possible to view them as a business as well? A business with their own responsibilities?
A legal matter I am sure.
7 September 2008
at 8:28 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tencman (Anonymous) says…
Huntenmomma,
If you “knew for a fact” of this beforehand, why are you just now volunteering information in a public forum? You may have prevented this whole situation. Aren't you sure that the first 4 words of your last post were probably the most accurate?
6 September 2008
at 7:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tencman (Anonymous) says…
You “know” this because he went to school with your brother?
4 September 2008
at 5:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tencman (Anonymous) says…
A good attorney will provide the best legal council possible whether the attorney is “High $$” or not. The actions of a man defending what is his and making no attempt to hide it in a situation such as this speaks for a lot of people in many different ways.. I doubt all the facts have been presented to the public and most have learned not to judge without all facts. It is amazing how many people claim to know what is legal and what isn't and who should pay and who shouldn't without knowing all the facts and delegated responsibilities.. We are all intitled to our opinions as well as being innocent until the end of the trial.
4 September 2008
at 5:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tencman (Anonymous) says…
How many starving animals should a rancher feed? One, One Hundred. Maybe a Thousand or so? Some areas get more Elk coming thru than others. Who sets the amount? When do you stop or start? What is the “Right thing to do”? Is someone just as responsible for letting them starve? Is there any guilt? Is there any responsibility? This is what trials are for. Not just for the accused but for the accuser as well. People are innocent unless they are proven guilty. The same rule applies to all of us.
4 September 2008
at 8:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tencman (Anonymous) says…
The “Trial” will determine what is legal and what is not in this case. Not the opinions and common gossip that surround it.