Jump to content
"Is Dr. Kinder leaving his practice and building to go to the old hospital and join that clinic"?
"And if so why? Why would he give that up?"
To provide better continuity of care for the patients he sees, and the patients that are seen by other specialists at the TMH clinic. Several specialties occupy the TMH clinic: Orthopedic, General Surgery, Urology, Obstetrics/Gynecology, Family Practice, and now add Internal Medicine. Being two blocks away(I know, it's not far)inhibits the ease of being there when another physician needs a consult from Dr. Kinder or if one of his patients needs a consult from one of the other specialists. It's a convenience factor that will benefit the patients most of all as they will no longer need to travel between the two locations, being centralized has many benefits. Its a win-win situation for him as well as the clinic.
His wife, Dr. Pamela Kinder will still be at the Kinder Family Clinic.
I'm sure there are other reasons but I am not going to speculate on what those might be.
Yes, we will follow the doctor, but I would prefer that my records follow along with me. Is he supposed to give them up for nothing?
Your comment(s) makes no sense at all.
Als362, probably right on that one. Still wondering how they get away with a user name that is objectionable and has nothing to do with facts, it's violating the CDP's own user policy.
Time to vote "justthefacts" off the island.
Hey, look at it this way. The online version is still free, and ad free as well......for now.
Dr .Kinder has plenty of patients, and patience. He is my doctor and the doctor of my family and has been since he arrived in Craig. I see no money wasted at all by TMH and it will be a nice improvement to the base of physicians employed by the hospital, at whatever cost.
Dr. Kinder is a very intelligent and compassionate physician, his knowledge of Internal Medicine will provide a boost to the wealth of medical knowledge already present in the current physicians and surgeons. It will make life easier for the patients seen by the TMH physicians by making him readily available to assist them in whatever capacity he can. Did you even read the article before spouting off?
Why do you have a problem with Dr. Kinder joining the TMH family justmyopinion?
"I have lived in Craig all my life, over 65 years. There never was deer in town until the last few years"
Huh, funny, I to have lived here all my life and in 43 years I DO remember the deer being around...all the time. I lived smack in the middle of town and would see them roaming the alleys everyday.
This is, as one couple said it one letter over, is becoming stupid and silly, the hantavirus is much easier to catch and can kill some people who are immunodeficient. I am trembling in my boots at the thought, so I demand we round up all the deer mice and have a killing spree(not).
Some people will resort to nonfactual information to push their agenda on those who won't research or don't understand..or care, this letter is a prime example of that method.
I say settle down people, the proper handling of the situation has commenced and the "DOW/50 citizen deer hating killing machine" has been put on idle. I trust the committee will come up with a REASONABLE plan to handle the problem of the awful "killer deer"(hey, maybe Hollywood should come up and make a horror movie).
(spoken in that movie trailer guys voice)
"No one can step outside.........(scream)
Dogs are being murdered........(bark)
No one can grow flowers anymore......(Scream)
Killer poop is on the loose........(scream)
You have just stepped into the Mule Deer Massacre Zone.......50 people hate them......thousands love them but they have all turned into cold blooded killers. Mayhem and madness have set in on this little mountain town where once docile deer have now turned into killing machines. They leave their deadly poop all over and kids are rubbing their hands in it and eating apples, dogs are murdered and citizens are being stared at. What is one to do? Grab a broom....maybe a shovel? Run for your life, the sky has fallen........and time.......is running out".
I couldn't help myself, but that is just how silly and stupid this is getting.
Why doesn't the county let the city pay $270,000 for 4 years and let the city own the space? Seems more logical than kicking them out and creating an empty hole in a very expensive building.
Another thing those who are actually paying for it should get to vote on.
A good topic for another DP reader poll, I can pretty much predict the outcome.
Do any of our elected officials really think that they do what the voters want them to do? It seems they have a path of their own and an agenda to match given some of the far out decisions made lately.
I agree with the above comments, stop acting like children and just do what's right.
Here is some useful information that might explain the costs and benefits of methods used to control urban deer populations.
Contraception and sterilization might sound like a good idea but the cost is very high for something that may, or may not, work.
You will need Adobe Acrobat or an equivalent to read this pdf file:
While it may be info from Wisconsin, where other deer species pose a much bigger problem, the methods used are generally across the board ideas that come up wherever I look.
I search "urban deer management" and am able to come up with a whole host of places to get useful information. It is because of some of these sites that I altered my outlook on the population control idea, I am still against mass eradication though.
This is something that cannot be rushed through and I am happy that there has been a committee formed and that they seem to be thinking this through, not overreacting to a few whiners.
Als362, your comment is exactly why I do not fly either, especially the "I hate everyone" part. There is not enough money on this planet to bribe me to fly due to that one fact alone.
Great letter, now that's "trapping and relocation".
Can we send all the perverts & wife beaters with them?
I understand you als362, but I am asking about city property...streets, sidewalks, parks.
If the city does not "own" the deer, and the deer injure someone on a city sidewalk, how is the city responsible?
If a dog(not owned by the city, like the deer)attacks me on a city sidewalk, it's the dog owner that is responsible...right?
Who is responsible if the deer attack someone in the same manner?
WHO owns the deer?
Last login: Friday, May 27, 2016
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2016 Craig Daily Press. All rights reserved.