craigdailypress.com

DV8 (Anonymous) says…

So, the murderer want to sue everyone involved with his prosecution… This does not mean that he has a case, nor does it mean he is innocent.
So what if the conviction is under appeal… that only means Hankins is utilizing his legal rights. It does not mean that there was problems with the prosecution. Many convicted criminals waste taxpayers time and money with frivolous appeals, just because they can.

After all, everyone in prison is innocent, just ask them.

DV8 (Anonymous) says…

When you work with the public, you need to look the part of your job. If you work in a tatoo parlor or alternative clothing store, by all means, wear your piercings to work.

I have multiple earings and facial piercings. I do not wear them to work, because I need to appear more respectable for the public's 1st opinion, so customers who will not have time or need to get to know me despite my piercings or tatoos.

I would not hire someone who came to an interview with extreme piercings or tatoos or who dressed in an unprofessional manner. I wouldn't care if they had them, they would just need to have them absent or hidden while on the clock.

DV8 (Anonymous) says…

I don't think the mines are to blame. They actually help the situation. Not everyone enjoys school. The mines offer an incredible oppertunity for a career after high school for those who have no interest in further education. If someone is not interested in higher education, what is the point of going to college, hating it, creating a large amount of debt in student loans, to get a job in your field that pays half of what the mines do?
The school system needs to raise their standards, so that non-college bound kids have an adequate knowledge base, so that they are educated and if they decide to go to college later in life, they won't be completely lost.

This isn't a “Just Craig” thing, in other parts of the country, these individuals go to work in mines, factories, farms, etc.

DV8 (Anonymous) says…

I hope they have to have a valid driver's license to drive ATVs on the streets of Craig. I would hate to see ATVs used by those who have lost their license to a DUI (or other means) using this to get around their restrictions.

DV8 (Anonymous) says…

I'm sure Fallon was great with little kids. My understanding of the problem with her is that she over exaggerated things to make up crimes and lied in police reports. I am curious if this is why she was fired. What came out in court?

DV8 (Anonymous) says…

Maybe it is because some of the teachers in Moffat Schools are incompetent and the schools cannot or will not get rid of them.

Maybe it's because no matter how poorly a student does, they go to the next grade, so their feelings are not hurt.

Maybe it's because the school has students cram for these tests, rather than actually teaching the material throughout the year, so when they take the test, it would be a measure, rather than a “fund raiser” (This is what some teachers have told the students the tests were).

The schools should evaluate the tests, find out what teacher's have too many students scoring low and get rid of those teachers. And, if there is a large percentage throughout the school, get rid of the administrators.

DV8 (Anonymous) says…

Eastsidebonnie,
My stone comment wasn't ignorance… it was sarcasm. Sarcasm is a sharply ironical taunt. I will try not to be too condescending here (that's when you talk down to someone). I have read the bible, so I do understand the reference. I also remember reading that the Deity character of the book states that man rules over the beasts. I have to say. I do agree with you that human murders and sex offenders should be put down, just like these dogs, you yourself explained rehabilitation efforts are futile. People were upset and continue to be upset by these people being let loose. You just didn't get as emotional and upset, because you agreed with them.

I will assume that you are a vegan, because if you are not, that would make you a hypocrit. I also hope that you don't wear anything made of leather, such as belts or shoes, since killing an animal is murder. Also, plants are living things. If you are concerned about killing living things, please do not eat any animals or plants or use any of their by-products and see how far that gets you.

As to being ignorant, I believe most of the people posting have some knowledge of what they are writing about and utilizing that knowledge to formulate an opinion. You are the one who seems to be shooting from the hip and answering impulsively without knowledge, as you do not know the ancestory of anyone here to know if their parents were related (inbred), nor do you know if any of the people posting are unsophisticated (hick), simply because you don't agree with others.

You are also right that calling someone “stupidest” would be acting like a six year old. I guess calling everyone “inbred” bumps you by a year or two, to the level of an 8 year old, it is a more sophisticated term.

So, If you truly believe destroying life is wrong, let us know how you are doing after not eating plants or animals for a month.

DV8 (Anonymous) says…

Eastsidebonnie,
Since I have never mauled a human and left a seven inch injury that caused a serious, potentially life-threatening infection, I feel free to cast stones. Animals know what they are doing, that is why they are able to be trained to not do things, such as get on furniture or try to kill people.

If, you were correct, and the dogs truly were not at fault, because they were only doing what is natural, why don't all dogs, or even all pit bulls randomly attack every person moving past them without provication? The answer is simple…

The dogs did choose to attack.

If you truly believe that dogs are unable to think and make choices, you need to start actually paying attention to your dog, because if you truly cared for your animal, you would see that it has an intelligence and thought processes, especially if you were working on training it to behave appropriately. If you really believe your own statement that you cannot control your animal, just have your dog euthanized now, because it will be the next one to attack and injure a person.

Anytime an animal hospitalizes a person, the animal should be killed.

DV8 (Anonymous) says…

The law states it is illegal for a child to possess or consume alcohol.

Theoretically if an adult allows a child to possess or consume alcohol (other than the stated exceptions) they are contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Wouldn't the person(s) over 21 at the party fit this definition?

It also seems that this allows for lazy police work. Doesn't matter if the owner of the home is aware of the party or not, they are now responsible and now have to worry about their own legal issues rather than the fact their child is drinking.

Just out of curiosity… since this would be a city ordinance, does that mean that it would go through City Court, rather than the District Attorney's office?

DV8 (Anonymous) says…

If this ordinance passes, that could be illegal. I didn't even think about cough syrup and many home and over the counter cold remedies. Many of them have alcohol in them. Treating your child's cold symptoms will become a punishable offence.