Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Question of the week
Would you support Secretary of the State Scott Gessler if he ran for Colorado governor?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
This site is best viewed with
or the latest version of Internet Explorer
29 May 2012
at 9:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…
Tip my cap to Mitt - if he wants to drive to NW Colorado for a campaign stop and happens to get a photo op with one of the school buses then that's fine with me.
I just probably wouldn't have let the buses be used at a political campaign event if I were running the bus garage.
29 May 2012
at 12:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…
This sign is truly moronic. I wonder if the kid came up with it, or his dumb parents.
29 May 2012
at 8:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…
Why are tax-payer funded school buses being used to display partisan campaign slogans?
28 May 2012
at 8:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…
“Tears rushed over us.”
For a campaign stop?
Ok, Frank Moe, settle down. He's a politician, not the savior.
25 May 2012
at 2:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…
He probably heard about Colorado's annual kick-off to summer and couldn't resist.
24 May 2012
at 11:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…
yampafamily - while I share your desire to see the community get healthier… I don't feel like the solution is more sidewalks or trails. That is an urban city problem. You have an abundance of options available in Craig - you already listed the two tracks, you've got Loudy Simpson to the south, the sand rocks to the North, Ridgeview to the West, Cedar Mountain is a quick drive away… Moreover, I think the town is already ideal for leisurely strolls - traffic isn't bad, there are plenty of sidewalks and the city keeps everything pretty well maintained relative to their big city counterparts.
I feel like there are a lot of valid complaints about Craig, but access to outdoor exercise is the least of the problems. If you aren't accessing it, that is on you.
24 May 2012
at 11:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…
I think the process worked in this instance. The council didn't rush to judgement, they attempted to give Tarango the benefit of the doubt, and he proved himself unworthy of a second chance. Now it's game over for Tarango.
I was in favor of letting him re-apply after some sort of cooling off period as I thought there was at least some possibility that it was an oversight or misunderstanding. Our governmental process ought to allow for those possibilities - and I'm glad they did. But then it became clear that this man is either unwilling or unable to play by the rules, in which case the council came to the appropriate decision.
24 May 2012
at 8:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…
I wanted to give Tarango the benefit of the doubt a few weeks ago… But he is clearly incompetent at best and dishonest at worst, so I will no longer defend him.
10 May 2012
at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…
ranger520 - does that apply until the end of time? Because he failed to disclose a couple of misdemeanors he should never be considered for a liquor license?
I'm not even sure I agree with background checking people to obtain a liquor license. As someone else stated, all licenses are subject to revocation if they are misused, so his background is almost a moot point.
9 May 2012
at 8:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…
David, you actually raise some valid concerns regarding the location, but the comment about amigos peeing on things because they don't agree with our government is straight up racism and detracts from an otherwise sound argument that you present. Don't be ignorant.