Jump to content
Whatever you say, darling. Shouldn't you be filing charges or something?
I'm all aquiver waiting to hear from you and your lawyer, sweetheart!
There is little moral distinction between cmommy and the Catholic hierarchy which transferred pedophile priests from parish to parish to conceal the malevolence in their midst. I have no doubt that if cmommy had the same kind of authority over her pet pedophile as the Catholic Church enjoyed over theirs, her favorite degenerate would still out there hunting for children to prey on. She's an enabler. If you're too blind to recognize her complicity in evil, you have my sympathies - and my contempt.
"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
~ Edmund Burke
Sadly, we can only wish you were doing nothing. Instead, you've chosen to rationalize cmommy's defense of evil, instead of condemning it. Child molestation is not a 'shades of grey' kind of issue. It couldn't be more black and white; it is a pure distillation of evil. Your eagerness to look the other way while cmommy defends the scumbag says a great deal about you, and none of it positive. I am enormously gratified that you've called me a "jerk." Considering the source, I'll wear it like a badge.
If you find my disdain to be “a bit harsh”, too bad. Call your (c)mommy and have a good cry. I'll continue to ridicule and belittle and berate despite your tender sensibilities. And unlike you and cmommy, I'll stand by every assertion I make with who I really am.
Go ahead and press charges sweetheart, lol! I'm in the book and easy to find. I can't wait to see you argue how someone hiding behind a cowardly veil of anonymity can be harassed – it should be fun!
My ridicule of someone who defends a pedophile is "a bit harsh." Thanks for clearing that up, lonelyone.
You & cmommy should take turns on the porch playing banjo for Burt Reynolds.
Reading comprehension is clearly not one of your strengths - I'm beginning to suspect that your IQ is roughly equivalent to your body temp.
No one has accused you of a crime. The individual who pleaded guilty to child pornography has. That you've chosen to defend that person makes you guilty of breathtaking stupidity. Being an imbecile is not a crime, but don't be shocked when reasonable people dismiss you as the idiot you are. You've chosen to weigh in on behalf of the most vile kind of behavior. You've earned the derision and scorn - your inability to own it just makes you a coward.
Anyone else notice the "Deliverance" vibe to cmommy's contributions here?
One wonders whom cmommy is defending here. She castigates "people in glass houses" - which suggests she believes everyone weighing in here to be pedophiles. Which, in turn, paints a very dark picture of the world she inhabits, and the evil, twisted degenerates with whom she chooses to share it.
Have a good time at your next GED/Pedophile reunion.
Given Commander Leonard's characterization of this as "...probably the worst child pornography case we’ve ever handled..." I'm baffled at the plea bargain. This a$$wipe oughtta spend the rest of his miserable life in prison, looking over his shoulder for the inevitable & well deserved shank. If there's a possibility of parole, we deserve to be apprised of his name and appearance.
Spellcheck. Punctuation. Grammar. Basic, 4th-grade command of the English language. Ye gods.
A point that has been spotlighted at least three times during this discussion. Apparently, your reading comprehension skills are on par with Mr. Mercier's writing abilities.
Last login: Wednesday, May 11, 2016
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2016 Craig Daily Press. All rights reserved.