Jump to content
“What I've said is we would put a cap and trade policy in place that is as aggressive if not more aggressive than anyone out there. I was the first to call for a 100 percent auction on the cap and trade system. So if somebody wants to build a coal powered plant they can. It's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.”
~ Barack Obama, 1/17/08
"Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket."
~Barack Obama, 1/17/08
To whom was BHO pandering, Leroy? Or is he just a liar? And if you're unaware of the President's endorsement of the EPA's “Utility MACT” initiative and what it'll do to the coal industry, then you are stunningly ignorant.
We can thank those pandering Repubs, by the way, for killing cap & tax.
You've received excellent advice here; I hope you avail yourself of it. Your writing skills leave much to be desired - if your resume reflects that deficiency, you're already one step behind. There are no end of people who can produce a professional resume for you at a nominal fee; I suggest you seek them out.
What stands out most prominently from your screed is "I would like to say this is not fair..." As someone has already pointed out, life isn't fair. Deal with it. Whining about the inequities of life makes you seem like a whiner, whether you are or not.
If the job you want isn't in Moffat county, move. The reason I wasn't born & raised in the American Southwest is because the best job offered to my dad at the time was in the Pacific Northwest, instead of Albuquerque as he would have preferred. Instead of complaining about unfairness, he made the move and got on with his life. The reason I'm no longer in the Seattle area is because my company was sold and the new owners 86ed the existing managers to make room for their own people. While I would have preferred to remain in the Northwest, the best job offer came from the Rocky Mountains, and here I am.
So cowboy up. Instead of bemoaning the perceived headwinds confronting you, expand your vision beyond your own backyard and embrace the opportunities that exist.
catch22 hit the nail on the head. America has amassed more debt and now owes more money than anyone has ever owed anybody. Ever. Ms. Arnett apparently agrees with the President that that's a good thing, and what we should do now is double down. Confiscate even more money from the private sector and shovel it into the public sector. If you're busting your tail in a non-government job you can suck wind, and be grateful that your efforts are funding government unions.
It's tempting to call Ms. Arnett an idiot, but I'm loathe to offend the idiots among us.
An open letter to Ron Paul, to which the Congressman has never replied:
Dear Congressman Paul:
Your Presidential campaign has drawn the enthusiastic support of an imposing collection of Neo-Nazis, White Supremacists, Holocaust Deniers, 9/11 “Truthers” and other paranoid and discredited conspiracists.
Do you welcome - or repudiate – the support of such factions?
More specifically, your columns have been featured for several years in the American Free Press – a publication of the nation’s leading Holocaust Denier and anti-Semitic agitator, Willis Carto. His book club even recommends works that glorify the Nazi SS, and glowingly describe the “comforts and amenities” provided for inmates of Auschwitz.
Have your columns appeared in the American Free Press with your knowledge and approval?
As a Presidential candidate, will you now disassociate yourself, clearly and publicly, from the poisonous propaganda promoted in such publications?
As a guest on my syndicated radio show, you answered my questions directly and fearlessly.
Will you now answer these pressing questions, and eliminate all associations between your campaign and some of the most loathsome fringe groups in American society?
Along with my listeners (and many of your own supporters), I eagerly await your response.
Respectfully, Michael Medved
Romney locked up the nomination last night. Only John Huntsman has fewer delegates than Ron Paul. What is it you see Paul doing with his 129 delegates - now that Romney has 1183?
I'm glad you're happy to reside out there on the fringe. It means you've exculded yourself any meaningful national policy decisions.
From Washington-Obama, this country has never elected a President from anything other than one of the two major parties. Ever. The reasons for that have principally to do with the differeces between the two main electoral systems employed by Western representative republics: single-member district pluralities, and proportional representation. It's probably too much to expect Paulians to know which of those is used here, let alone the realities it imposes.
In all of American history, Roosevelt posted the best 3rd-party Presidential election results, garnering 27.4% of the popular vote in 1912. Ross Perot won 18.9% in 1992, and George Wallace 13.5% in 1968.
The only time Ron Paul appeared on all 50 General Election Presidential ballots (in 1988), he won 0.47% of the popular vote. THERE'S an electoral juggernaut for ya.
So I encourage you to write Paul on your November ballot. Support for that nutcase is so anemic, you will have no impact on the election and exert zero influence on the direction of the country.
A vote for Ron Paul is a wasted one, and increases the likelihood of the President's re-election.
A potted plant would be an improvement over Barack Obama.
Worst. President. Of my lifetime. Quite an achievement, as I never anticipated Jimmy Carter would ever be eclipsed in that regard.
If Obama ever visits, I hope he doesn't have the family dog working its way through the Presidential colon.
The phrase “separation of church and state” appears nowhere in the Federalist Papers, the Declaration, or Constitution. The Establishment Clause was crafted to prevent the government from ever establishing or sanctioning an official state religion.
The “wall of separation” wasn't built until nearly two centuries after the Constitution was ratified; by the Supreme Court's 1947 Everson v. the Board of Education decision. It was a 5-4 ruling, in whose majority opinion that “wall of separation” language appears for the first time in American jurisprudence. The majority opinion was authored by former Ku Klux Klan lawyer Hugo Black, whom many believe was motivated in no small measure by his virulent antipathy for the Catholic Church (had it been up to Justice Black, American law would have prohibited a Catholic like JFK from getting anywhere near the Oval Office).
Everson has swung the pendulum to asinine extremes. As a card-carrying heathen, I believe the illegality of a nativity scene on the courthouse lawn to be ridiculous. Back in my old stomping grounds, there was a Seattle mayor who issued an executive order prohibiting anyone on the city payroll from uttering the words “merry Christmas.” Idiot much, Mr. Mayor? A number of other municipal executives have followed that lead in recent years. In 2009, a college (in Minnesota, IIRC) excused a blind student from class because his guide dog offended the Muslim students in attendance.
Staggering pinnacles of arrogance, sanctimony, and stupidity. And it's all brought to you by Everson in 1947 – not by James Madison in 1787.
Last login: Friday, May 15, 2015
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2015 Craig Daily Press. All rights reserved.