Jump to content
Reports indicate the San Bernadino scumbags spent much of their online time at ISIS sites, and that they were in communication with at least one international terrorist. Not to mention visits to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. What a lame cover up. It can’t be a coincidence that the attack came immediately following the outrageous failure to achieve consensus at the Paris global warming conference. And Preezy’s impassioned fairy tale about fish swimming in the streets of Miami. There can be no denying the catalyst: Global Warming. Bernie Sanders is right. Bernie is a Prophet! (Propeller Beanie Upon Him)
For all Mark Jacobson's childish spew about cowardice, here's a rundown of the 60+ ISIS vermin we've been obliged to arrest in our own cities in the last 18 months. The vast majority of whom are “refugees.” Keep in mind BHO's own FBI and State Department say it's impossible to vet the 85 thousand Syrians he wants to import.
I'm also curious as to why these refugees are not being invited into Arab jurisdictions in their own neighborhood: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Iran, the UAE, etc. Are the officials and populations there encumbered by cowardice? If not, why?
Interesting to note that not even DiFi is buying Preezy's pap. Nor the lefties at MSNBC.
Curious how we never heard a peep from Trump when Governor Brewer was the lone voice in the wilderness; the only leader in America taking a stand against Obama's open borders.
Trump doesn't speak from conviction. He's a blowhard who will say anything as long as it gets him some ink. Since we don't really know what his convictions are, we have no idea what he'd do if the fit hits the shan. He's the ultimate 'wet finger in the air' windbag who needs to stick to his rich boy celebrity routine and leave the heavy lifting to the grownups.
You're absolutely right, since you lack the intellectual firepower to acknowledge, let alone defend your own childish straw men.
You wrote: "How about let the people who live here have a say in it."
Who it not being allowed a say in it, and who is denying them a say in it? What have I missed?
Who is being denied "a say in it", Mark? It sounds like you're irritated that Dennis would presume to share his opinion here. Do you believe that those with different perspectives should be censored?
So the eco nannies exercising their 1st Amendment privilege=injustice. Thanks for clearing that up. And if the end result runs counter to the stated objective, you can celebrate the severed nose for spiting the face so beautifully. Because it makes one feel good, and that's the most important consideration.
“There’s no such thing as bad publicity.”
~ Old media axiom
I’ve always regarded boycotts as little more than an excuse for demagogues to mount their soapboxes and throw a tantrum. I remember lefty heads exploding back in the 90s when Rush Limbaugh was signed to an orange juice endorsement deal. The ensuing boycott and attendant publicity resulted in a significant spike in sales.
Any publicity this generates beyond Craig will only help New Belgium.
How about cheerleading for President Obama's murder, Allen? What kind of a "debater" does that make you?
What David said.
Last login: Tuesday, February 2, 2016
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2016 Craig Daily Press. All rights reserved.