Jump to content
"...our earth needs to do a huge purging of populations..."
Really? How, exactly?
The nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle practiced by those like the Native Americans requires one square mile per inhabitant. The entire land surface of the earth would be unable to sustain the population of California, living as the Native Americans did.
"...and yes there is such a word as gramer…"
lol. Have a great time at your next GED reunion.
"...Colvin’s criminal record includes three prior arrests for driving under the influence."
Three DUIs? Ye gods.
Before criticizing someone else’s grammar, you might consider elevating your spelling above the 3rd-grade level. There’s no such word as “grammer.”
Right on the money re: China & India. The pressure they exert on the demand side of the equation is likely to make domestic production more feasible than it's been in my lifetime.
You raise a relevant point, but it's not nearly as valid as it has been during most of my lifetime, in the wake of the massive deposits located all over the world in the last 10-20 years: Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, North Sea, & Canada; and the emergence of Russia as a major player.
Big Brother needs to get out of the way and let the chips fall where they may.
Not only is he mucking up the works domestically, he's sticking his nose into one of our most reliable ally's affairs, by deep-sixing the Keystone Pipeline. I'm guessing the 20,000 Americans who would have been employed by the project may consider the President's decision to reek of “intrusion.”
Fact: we consume far more energy than we produce. Of the amount we import, nearly 40% is acquired from regimes who would like nothing better than to see the U.S. brought to its knees. We have the ability and the resources to produce all we need. The single biggest roadblock is government red tape.
You're wearing an impressive set of blinders. Coal produces quite a number of jobs in these parts; let's start there. We have sufficient domestic deposits to keep us supplied for 3 centuries, at current consumption rates. The industry has be relentlessly attacked, in a campaign that has ramped up considerably over the last decade. Google 'Montgomery County, Maryland carbon tax'. I'll wager that the state's sole producer of electricity find their government “intrusive” - not to mention the consumers whose rates skyrocketed as a result. And there are endless additional examples. The President has made your side's position explicitly clear:
“So if someone wants to build a coal powered plant, they can. It's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF7Qm3...
If he and his compadres on the left are able to pass cap and tax, that's exactly what will happen. I'll bet all those suddenly jobless Americans would find that a tad “intrusive.”
The President's 2011 budget imposed another $80 billion in taxes on the oil & gas industries. Congress (Dem Reps Markey & VanHollen) has introduced legislation that will retroactively change existing contracts between the government & companies presently drilling in the Gulf of Mexico; the President has indicated he'll sign it and agrees with the requirement that the companies cough up $54 billion in the name of “deficit reduction.” Costs, which will of course, be passed on to the consumer. Sounds “intrusive” to me.
LSU Prof Joseph Mason's congressional testimony last year tallied the costs of the President's Gulf drilling moratorium:
“… [O]utput losses continue to mount with stalled development in the Gulf, rising from $2.1 billion regionally and $2.8 billion nationally to $3.3 billion and $4.4 billion, respectively. Job losses are estimated to have increased from 8,000 regionally and 12,000 nationally to 13,000 regionally and 19,000 nationally. Lost wages previously estimated to amount to $500 million regionally and $700 million nationally are now $800 million regionally and $1.1 billion nationally. Finally, lost tax revenues estimated to be $100 million on the state and local level and $200 million on the national level now amount to $155 million and $350 million, respectively. ”
I'll bet the 19,000 people out of work found Big Bro to be more than a little “intrusive.”
Nice example of taking a single statistic out of context in service to personal axe-grinding. It's useful to define petroleum “products” - as we are able to use our own refining capacity to produce the finished products that countries like Brazil, Mexico, the Netherlands, Spain, Guatemala, Canada, France, Argentina, & Turkey can't turn out on their own. Crude is the grist for that mill, and the import v. export numbers on that score are undeniable.
U.S. crude imports by supplier (barrels per month):
Total U.S. imports per month: 340,821. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration http://188.8.131.52/dnav/pet/pet_move_impcus_a2_nus_ep00_im0_mbbl_m.htm
Total U.S. exports per month: 96,233. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration http://184.108.40.206/dnav/pet/pet_move_exp_dc_NUS-Z00_mbbl_m.htm
I gather that Spicoli must be a pop-culture referent that I'm just not hip to. I suspect it's not a compliment. Most impressive! I don't think I've been so thoroughly chastened since Ronnie Heffler called me a doodie head in the second grade. You should start a debate team, Leroy. You're truly formidable. Really.
Last login: Friday, May 15, 2015
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2015 Craig Daily Press. All rights reserved.