See complete forecast
You are not logged in. (Log in • Create account)
11 July 2012
at 9:58 a.m.
Way late to the party…
Bryce Jacobson writes: “In, [sic] addition I am not sure I am aware of another business that gives away its product, maybe you do, at your business, I am just not sure.”
What an enormously arrogant and condescending (not to mention disingenuous) remark. Apparently, your sister publication in Steamboat is “giving away its product”, as it has not limited access by imposing a subscription firewall. Are you aware now, Bryce?
As a right-wing capitalist, I don't begrudge anyone their prerogative to implement any business model they choose to try and maximize revenues and profits. But to respond so contemptuously to a reader who happens to disagree with that model is childish, at BEST.
Here's what the subscription requirements means to me, and I suspect, to a majority of your online readership: I'll be visiting much less frequently (the annoying ads that I have to actually seek out & figure out how to shut off have already started that trend in my case), and your online advertisers will lose those views. If it remains a profitable arrangement for you and them despite the reduced traffic, more power to you.
If you continue to deal with your readers as disdainfully as you responded to David, then shame on you.
5 July 2012
at 7:50 a.m.
It's been over a week now since cmommy threatened to press charges against me, and I have yet to hear from the police. I guess she doesn't love me any more. I feel so abandoned…
28 June 2012
at 3:10 p.m.
Have you pressed charges against me yet? No sense putting it off. I can't wait for CPD to come knocking. Cops love sex offenders, and I'm sure they're 110% behind you and your beloved degenerate. Really. Their number is 824-8111. No need to thank me, snookums. It's all part of the service.
27 June 2012
at 3:40 p.m.
Whatever you say, darling. Shouldn't you be filing charges or something?
27 June 2012
at 2:28 p.m.
I'm all aquiver waiting to hear from you and your lawyer, sweetheart!
27 June 2012
at 11:35 a.m.
There is little moral distinction between cmommy and the Catholic hierarchy which transferred pedophile priests from parish to parish to conceal the malevolence in their midst. I have no doubt that if cmommy had the same kind of authority over her pet pedophile as the Catholic Church enjoyed over theirs, her favorite degenerate would still out there hunting for children to prey on. She's an enabler. If you're too blind to recognize her complicity in evil, you have my sympathies - and my contempt.
“All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”~ Edmund Burke
Sadly, we can only wish you were doing nothing. Instead, you've chosen to rationalize cmommy's defense of evil, instead of condemning it. Child molestation is not a 'shades of grey' kind of issue. It couldn't be more black and white; it is a pure distillation of evil. Your eagerness to look the other way while cmommy defends the scumbag says a great deal about you, and none of it positive. I am enormously gratified that you've called me a “jerk.” Considering the source, I'll wear it like a badge.
If you find my disdain to be “a bit harsh”, too bad. Call your (c)mommy and have a good cry. I'll continue to ridicule and belittle and berate despite your tender sensibilities. And unlike you and cmommy, I'll stand by every assertion I make with who I really am.
Go ahead and press charges sweetheart, lol! I'm in the book and easy to find. I can't wait to see you argue how someone hiding behind a cowardly veil of anonymity can be harassed – it should be fun!
26 June 2012
at 7:39 p.m.
My ridicule of someone who defends a pedophile is “a bit harsh.” Thanks for clearing that up, lonelyone.
You & cmommy should take turns on the porch playing banjo for Burt Reynolds.
26 June 2012
at 11:01 a.m.
Reading comprehension is clearly not one of your strengths - I'm beginning to suspect that your IQ is roughly equivalent to your body temp.
No one has accused you of a crime. The individual who pleaded guilty to child pornography has. That you've chosen to defend that person makes you guilty of breathtaking stupidity. Being an imbecile is not a crime, but don't be shocked when reasonable people dismiss you as the idiot you are. You've chosen to weigh in on behalf of the most vile kind of behavior. You've earned the derision and scorn - your inability to own it just makes you a coward.
25 June 2012
at 11:34 p.m.
Anyone else notice the “Deliverance” vibe to cmommy's contributions here?
25 June 2012
at 4:12 p.m.
One wonders whom cmommy is defending here. She castigates “people in glass houses” - which suggests she believes everyone weighing in here to be pedophiles. Which, in turn, paints a very dark picture of the world she inhabits, and the evil, twisted degenerates with whom she chooses to share it.
or see results without voting.
This site is best viewed with
or the latest version of Internet Explorer
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2013 Craig Daily Press. All rights reserved.