Back to profile

Comments made by Dr Bob Niewoehner

  1. 4 September 2008
    at 10:47 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    2cool4school (Dr Bob Niewoehner) says…


    Well how's it going so far?

  2. 29 August 2008
    at 12:26 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    2cool4school (Dr Bob Niewoehner) says…


    For Mr rexford. First of all - for what it worth - I am half White Mountain Apache. I have no idea what that has to do with Mr Culverwell shooting all the “starving” Elk (or my poor spelling for that matter). What I do know is that what he did was and is “Illegal”, simple at that - trial or no trial. And the fact that he just left them to rot?….come on, maybe he could have fed some of us poor 'ol Native Americans. Granted, if we would have had a little better immergration laws way back when, he would not even have been here now would he? But again, that ain't the problem. Problem is - you have a guy, with an automatic-weapon, shooting things he ain't suspose to. He broke the law. Even if the “law” is not fair, even if he was 'protecting his property' … (and I have my doubts there - but ….) he broke the law. Now, if it's not a good law, or there is something 'wrong' with the law - then change the law. Personally, …I doubt that this is the first time your Mr. Culverwell killed poor 'ol starving Elk (or other critters who happen to be on his ranch)…starving or not…..that just does not seem to be the profile here. Anyway - we will see what happens, that is why we have a Justice system is it not? So, Let's see how well it works. No matter what happens it seems that about half of the people will disagree with the outcome. However, one thing will happen, and you can bet on that - Mr. Culverwell will not be a shooten' any more Starvin' Elk and leaving them to rot. And that's a good thing.

  3. 29 August 2008
    at 9:58 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    2cool4school (Dr Bob Niewoehner) says…


    It's good to see that people are at least getting involved - God bless ya. I apologize for my 'spelling' but as an old man my fingers don't hit the right keys - anyway everyone seemed to get my point. Now, if you can believe 'ol Rodneys ex-wife, this ain't his first 'big game hunt' with the good 'ol boys. Ergo, why not talk to some of the 'good 'ol boys'…offer them immunity, and see if in fact they would get 'liquored up' and go shot what ever came to sight? The 'ex' say's that what happened not once but often - I somehow have the feelin' she could be correct. And explain to me how carolynhorse3 knows these poor Elk were 'starving to death'? Hungry…I suspose, but “starving to death”? Come on. Anyway - not the point - Point is - You can't go shooting critters just be cause you can - Sorry. What is it about “illegal” don't you understand? Might not be fair, might not be right….but guys, like our neighbors from the south - “Illegal” is Illegal. Mr Culverwell has nothing coming. Ergo, if you thing Illegal doesn't mean illegal you need to change the law's…don't blame your State Government agency. Get off your butt and change the law's - no sniveling please.

  4. 27 August 2008
    at 11:30 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    2cool4school (Dr Bob Niewoehner) says…


    Come on folks, you don't go shootin' Elk (or any other wild critter) for doing what they do - rancher or no rancher. He's just one of the “good 'ol boys” who assume that thay can do what ever they want on their 'ranch'. The Elk were here first….live with it, or sell the 'ranch' and move to Arkansas where you belong. Then, he shot 'em and just let them lay - heck, I'm sure there is an orphenage or old folks home or someone who could use the meat - ergo, he's got nothing comming. Convict and punish.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

This site is best viewed with Spreadfirefox Affiliate Button or the latest version of Internet Explorer