Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the entire Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare?
| Response | Percent | Votes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No, the entire act is unconstitutional and should have been repealed. | 55% | 234 | |
| Yes, the entire act is constitutionally sound. | 29% | 126 | |
| No, parts of the act are OK, but other parts are unconstitutional and should have been repealed. | 14% | 61 | |
| Undecided | 0% | 4 | |
| Total | 425 | ||
Requires free craigdailypress.com registration. Register or log in below.
Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
2 July 2012 at 8:01 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
T066J (Anonymous) says…
Let me get this straight . . .
We're going to be “gifted” with a health care plan we are forced to purchase and fined if we don't, which purportedly covers at least ten million more people, without adding a single new doctor, but provides for 16,000 new IRS agents, written by a committee whose chairman says he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that didn't read it but exempted themselves from it, and signed by a President who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, for which we'll be taxed for four years before any benefits take effect, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that's broke.
What the he** could possibly go wrong?