Editorial: In pursuit of truth | CraigDailyPress.com

Editorial: In pursuit of truth

"The rule is perfect: in all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane."
— Mark Twain

The following scenario can be found everywhere from cable newscasts to coffee shop chats.

A hot-button issue arises, and what began as a reasonable conversation spirals into heated disagreement.

Participants take sides and refuse to listen to what their fellow conversationalist — now their opponent — has to say.

The quip that leads this editorial was written with Mark Twain's characteristic sarcasm, yet it holds truth.

In matters of debate, it's too easy to dismiss the views of someone of a different persuasion — conservative or liberal, Republican or Democrat — as the ravings of a misinformed mind.

Recommended Stories For You

Yet this begs the question: Has anyone in the debate really sat down and considered his or her own opinions critically, judging their views from all sides and angles?

More importantly, would it do any harm to listen to the other side of the argument?

There's no shortage of issues to kindle passionate debate. Everything from national headlines to decisions made in local government are fertile grounds to explore new viewpoints and examine unchallenged ideas.

The problem is people often default to party lines and old loyalties.

Reason gives way to dogma, and unexamined opinions take the place of well-rationed ideas.

The example set by major media outlets doesn't help much. Heated confrontations get good ratings, and broadcasters often showcase verbal dogfights that excite rather than inform.

But the issue doesn't belong solely to mass media. The problem extends to the personal level, too.

It's easy for people to gravitate to the news outlet or pundit that aligns with their personal opinions, naively believing their source is fair and balanced simply because it spouts the same ideas.

Preferring one source above another isn't harmful in itself, but that outlet shouldn't be the sole point of supply for a person's information. A mind that never has to gauge the merit of another point of view will likely remain mired in its own unexamined opinions.

By contrast, critical thinkers consider the facts that formed their opinions. They challenge what they believe to see if it still holds weight.

Critical thinking isn't a mere luxury in the digital age — it's a necessity as readers and viewers try to make sense of the flood of information coming through their computer and TV screens.

The editorial board issues this challenge to the community: pursue truth, not party lines or preconceived notions.

Examine long-held convictions and see if they still hold weight.

Sit down with people from a different end of the political spectrum and try to understand how they formed their views.

Putting personal opinions under the microscope is rarely easy or comfortable, but it cultivates an informed mind, one of the most important tools a person can have.

Click here to have the print version of the Craig Daily Press delivered to your home.

Editorial board members:

• Al Cashion

— Community representative

• Alisa Corey

— Community representative

• Bryce Jacobson

— Newspaper representative

• Bridget Manley

— Newspaper representative

• Jerry Martin

— Newspaper representative

• Dave Pike

— Community representative

Our View

People everywhere often rely on assumptions and have hair-trigger reactions to issues rather than gather the facts and weigh the other side of the argument before shaping their own opinions.

Go back to article