U.S. Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo., speaks with Moffat County Commissioner Tom Gray on Friday after a discussion about the American Recovery and Reinvestment Bill of 2009 at Craig City Hall. Local residents and officials spoke with the congressman about the federal stimulus package, as well as other issues.

Photo by Hans Hallgren

U.S. Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo., speaks with Moffat County Commissioner Tom Gray on Friday after a discussion about the American Recovery and Reinvestment Bill of 2009 at Craig City Hall. Local residents and officials spoke with the congressman about the federal stimulus package, as well as other issues.

Locals appreciate John Salazar's visit, but stimulus concerns linger

photo

Several local officials attended Salazar's stimulus package presentation, such as Craig City Councilor Terry Carwile, at right, and Moffat County Commissioner Audrey Danner, next to him. However, city and county residents also attended and asked questions about topics ranging from the Democrats' energy agenda to affordable health care.

At a glance

Colorado's expected share

U.S. Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo., shared pieces Friday in Craig of how the federal stimulus package now before the Senate can help Colorado's infrastructure. The current bill would provide:

• $565 million for highways and bridges.

• $47.4 million for water projects and state grants.

• More than $100 million for transit and rail.

• $67.8 for public education funding beyond current allocations.

• $1 million in additional Medicaid assistance.

• $15.6 million for the Low-income Energy Assistance Program, which subsidizes family heating costs.

Moffat County Commissioner Tom Gray and 39-year-old Craig resident Patrick Germond, both registered Republicans, now feel a little better about at least one congressional Democrat's plans.

After a presentation by U.S. Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo., on Friday at Craig City Hall, both said they are more comfortable with the pending American Recovery and Reinvestment Bill of 2009, otherwise known as President Barack Obama's stimulus package.

Gray originally thought the government was making a mistake by borrowing money to increase federal spending.

After hearing Salazar discuss the differences between the current stimulus package and the one passed in October 2008 to prop up investment banks, Gray said he is more at ease with what Congress is doing.

However, he remains unconvinced whether things will work out the way Salazar described.

"I know a lot of people who are skeptical that we're digging a bigger hole because we have to borrow this money," the congressman said. "The difference between the stimulus package passed last time and the package this time, this package is designed to create American jobs that will stay here in America."

Putting people to work is the only way to save the economy, Salazar said. A well-paying job makes people feel secure enough to start spending money, which creates demand for business.

Prosperity trickles upward in this scenario, Salazar said, by attacking the root problem to save the rest of the tree.

The stimulus plan has the added benefit of providing a method to repay the federal Treasury, he said, because every new job will contribute to the country's tax base.

Gray did not find fault with the congressman's logic. Creating jobs is essential to any working economy, he agreed, but he wonders if Congress will be able to restrain itself from spending whatever new taxes would be generated.

"I still have some of the same concerns" as before, Gray said. "This will work only if Congress uses the money to pay off that debt, but there's always that incentive to do something bigger and better the next time."

Funding plans

The approximately $819 billion recovery plan now in front of the Senate is the first of several, Salazar said.

The president's fear is that it would be too difficult to track what money is spent if it all were given out at one time, Salazar said, so he wants Congress to pass segments individually.

Part of the reason Salazar came to Craig - and planned to visit six different Western Slope communities Friday and today - is to hear from locals on what needs they have for future stimulus packages and other federal appropriations, he said. Germond, a longtime Craig resident, had a simple take-home message for the congressman.

"A lot of the things I've been seeing with this new spending bill seem like a Democratic wish list," he said. "We need things that make sense for us and that will actually make a difference."

Germond referred specifically to funding for Planned Parenthood, a family planning service that advocates for birth control and abortions as options for women. Salazar said funding for Planned Parenthood was dropped from the final bill passed by the House on Wednesday, but he agreed with Germond's point. The congressman hopes Capital Hill will be able to let go of traditional politics and move forward with definite plans to restore America.

"I don't agree with every part of this bill," Salazar said. "I would hope the infrastructure piece would be a lot larger."

So does Germond, he said after the meeting. He does not want his kids in debt for social programs when the country has bigger needs.

"Tax cuts and infrastructure projects are the only things I support," he said. "I don't mind spending money when we have something to show for it. If the government wants to help us build schools and roads and hospitals, that's fine. If my kid has to pay that debt, at least she still gets to go to the hospital, she still gets to use the roads."

What's in it for us?

Local officials will have to stay alert to bring much of the current stimulus package home to Craig and Moffat County, Salazar said.

"There are no earmarks in this bill," he told the crowd. "The only thing the federal government wants is transparency and accountability. It's up to the states and local governments to get the money out."

Elected officials and residents can use the same resource to see what money is available and how to apply, Salazar added.

A new Web site, www.recovery.gov, will be the central hub for much of the stimulus program, once a bill passes Congress.

Gray said allowing local governments to make their own decisions about what projects need funding is a good and refreshing way for Washington, D.C., to operate.

But there still are layers, and it will take time to see how much authority counties and cities actually get, he said.

"I have a concern that because it first goes to the state, that the state will use its political spin to tell us what programs need to be funded," Gray said. "My belief is, we can decide what is needed the most and how to spend wisely rather than another layer above us or a layer above that."

Comments

Patrick Germond 5 years, 2 months ago

I also told Salazar to talk some sense into those people back there in that house. I then told him this bill looks like a liberal Democrat wish list. And if gas is $5 a gallon and families are homeless, a bike path to Steamboat aint gonna cut it.

Then I said, "I disagree with you that this is a Republican problem, you Democrats are on the court all by yourselves, you either make the shot or you choke."

But, if we get our hospital paid for or a new lane on U.S. 40 to Steamboat then yea, we do need that anyway.

Also, he has been able to get back almost 100% of our tax dollars from the federal government for use in Colorado. For that I give him an A+.

There was no doubt that no one supported the garbage bill that has been shown so far. When he calls back to talk to Pelosi, he can say things need to change a great deal or our bu#@s will be out in 2 years because the country isn't buying our spin.

Jobs and tax cuts, that's all I support. I'll write some more on Saturday. There was a lot of talk about this enviromental blocking of projects. Funny stuff.

0

Patrick Germond 5 years, 2 months ago

So did you guy's see the new bill Obama signed today? The SCHIP bill? It puts 4 million more people up to the age of 30 (not just kids) on free health care. Also, if you are illigal you do not have to show I.D. to enroll. It's all payed for by a $.62 hike on tobaco. I know, I know, Obama said he wouldn't raise taxes on the poor or middle class but I guess he couldn't resist. Also, the poor don't mind paying for health care for illigals, right? Anyway, there's your update on free health care and where your taxes go.

P.S. I wonder if Mexico ran anthing on their T.V. telling all their people they're now eligable for health care in the U.S..

0

greeneyedgurl 5 years, 2 months ago

Oh Rainbow I would like to object to your alcohol comment. It really is necessary for some of us.

0

Really 5 years, 2 months ago

Nothing wrong with taxing cigarettes - they are not necessary to live. Tax alcohol, too.

0

STANHATHHORN 5 years, 2 months ago

Rainbow, I understand that the nation is short about 27 million smokers to meet the monetary obligations of this bill. I already pay over $200,000 per year in health premiums and I don't smoke. It looks like I will pay even more due to the lack of smokers. In lieu of smokers picking up the tab, how about anyone who's name begins with "R". Sounds just as fair to me.

0

Patrick Germond 5 years, 2 months ago

Rainbow, you missed the point by a mile. He taxed the middle class and the poor, if it wasn't tobacco, he would have found another way to tax the poor and middle class for free health care.

I don't know anyone who smokes who doesn't want to quit. Also, it's more addictive than herion. So the government is putting it to people who have already got themselves in a bad fix.

Also, I have a paper I picked up in Juction today. The headline reads, "Salazar shuts down drilling in Utah." All for enviromental reviews and such. This just makes for more unenployment and higher gas prices. Plus, while we're down and out, other countries can rake in our money this summer.

This is like a bad car reck. The Democratic party driving us 80 mph over the speed limit on icy roads. We may survive, but they wont.

0

Really 5 years, 2 months ago

Yeah, I did live through the Carter years. Guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

0

Really 5 years, 2 months ago

The American Cancer Society estimates that the increased tax will decrease lung cancer deaths by 900,000 because of the number of people who will quit or cut down because of the expense.

As for the shut down in drilling - it was a last minute move by Bush to open up areas around Arches, Canyonlands, and other beautiful national park and monument areas. See the Denver Post yesterday for the full story - not just a headline that doesn't tell the whole story. Also, according to an article in the Post, energy companies are shutting down rigs around Parachute and people are losing jobs. Why open up more land to drilling when they aren't even drilling what they have?

At least Obama is trying to fund this insurance plan somehow, even if the tax doesn't cover it all.

Don't rich people smoke? I know some people with money that do. How is it a tax on just middle class and poor people?

0

Patrick Germond 5 years, 2 months ago

Good morning Rianbow. One point you brought up was prevention. That makes people want to cry. You see, people still get older and die of something. Lung cancer prevention is proven to be a huge burden on our health care system. Instead of people just being decent enough to die at 50, they go on to become a real burden on SSI, nursing homes, families, and end up dieing from other diseases anyway. However, I believe in prevention 100%. Just please don't use it as a cost saving arguement.

Here's something you may see in the future. (I'm not for) Obama may try to pay for all of this stuff by adding a tax to your credit card bill. We don't need those to live, right? Call it a financial sin tax.

My over all point is this. We will all pay for this one way or another. Not just a select few. It all trickles down.

As for drilling, you'll see why panic would sent into Bill Clinton when he even thought gas would go up. You haven't lived through the Carter years I take it? It took the liberals 40 years to have another shot at power. Their blowing it in the first two weeks. Noway will anything besides lots of drilling keep foreign countries from killing the middle class and poor this summer or soon after. Nothing else will stop that in time.

0

Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.