Discussions

Reader comments

On County discusses policy revision

Comments

Craig Daily Press doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.

  1. 24 June 2008 at 8:34 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    50cal (Anonymous) says…

    maybe if they can tarnish her name the establishment can run basically unopposed agian.

  2. 24 June 2008 at 10:23 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    lonelyone (Anonymous) says…

    This just seems crazy and nit pikie to me!

  3. 24 June 2008 at 10:30 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    King_Lears_Clown (Anonymous) says…

    Oh nuncle. Not again. It makes one wonder how competent of a DA she will be when she can't read a statute.

  4. 24 June 2008 at 1:50 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    50cal (Anonymous) says…

    as long as she didn't actively campaign I don't think she broke a statute.

  5. 25 June 2008 at 10:11 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    lonelyone (Anonymous) says…

    Is it not a PUBLIC library? Isn't she PUBLIC too??
    If a person can't use a “public” place owned by the county, were in this town would they hold an informational meeting such as she did……….there aren't any that I can think of that the county doesn't own! Oh I guess she could have use one of the rooms and the Holiday Inn or the Cavvy and pay for it.
    And this issue could effect each and everyone of us since they THINK they might make it so you or I as non county employees, would not be able to use those building for campaigning either!! That seems to be a dandy way of controling things!

  6. 25 June 2008 at 10:50 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    50cal (Anonymous) says…

    establishment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Advertisement

Advertisement