Discussions

Reader comments

On Mitt Romney … meet Craig, America

  1. 26 May 2012 at 9:01 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    3canines (Anonymous) says…

    Hope he doesn't have the family dog in a crate tied to the roof of the campaign bus.

  2. 26 May 2012 at 10:02 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    s (Anonymous) says…

    Awesome!

  3. 26 May 2012 at 10:11 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    Brian_Kotowski (Anonymous) says…

    If Obama ever visits, I hope he doesn't have the family dog working its way through the Presidential colon.

  4. 26 May 2012 at 11:33 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    3canines (Anonymous) says…

    Awww, c'mon, Brian. Educate yourself, if possible.

  5. 26 May 2012 at 2:38 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    Taxpayer (Anonymous) says…

    And can you believe some of the people selected as leaders of our community - what a farce!

  6. 26 May 2012 at 3:21 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    silentman (Anonymous) says…

    Am I surprised in Tom Gray's comments? NOT! I mean he's only a two term Republican County Commissioner and he doesn't know where the (presumptive) Republican Presidential candidate stands on the issues!!!! How does a person like that even get elected Commissioner in the first place???

  7. 26 May 2012 at 6:36 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    Brian_Kotowski (Anonymous) says…

    A potted plant would be an improvement over Barack Obama.

    Worst. President. Of my lifetime. Quite an achievement, as I never anticipated Jimmy Carter would ever be eclipsed in that regard.

  8. 26 May 2012 at 11:23 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    jmed (Anonymous) says…

    Vote for Ron Paul 2012 Liberty or death!

  9. 27 May 2012 at 4:29 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    Brian_Kotowski (Anonymous) says…

    A vote for Ron Paul is a wasted one, and increases the likelihood of the President's re-election.

  10. 27 May 2012 at 8:15 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    haveathought (Anonymous) says…

    Mitt looks a little confused in the photo. “Why am I going to Craig”?

  11. 27 May 2012 at 1:38 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    italiris4 (Denise Bagley) says…

    Brian— I agree. Voting for Ron Paul is the same as taking a vote from Romney. Ron Paul is not going to win, so why bother; you might as well cast your vote for Obama.

  12. 27 May 2012 at 11:38 p.m.

    Suggest removal

    jmed (Anonymous) says…

    Well, I will always vote the way I see it fit. If everyone thinks that just voting for Ron Paul is taking away a vote from Romney then what would happen if all those people actually voted for Ron Paul? Could it be or would it be possible that Ron Paul would win? Hmmm, what a concept. You should go back to your flocks and tell the rest of the media sheeple that there would be a chance. Ron Paul is taking a ton of delegates lately and GOP chairs.

  13. 28 May 2012 at 8:05 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    Buff_bronc_fan (Anonymous) says…

    Tears rushed over us.”

    For a campaign stop?

    Ok, Frank Moe, settle down. He's a politician, not the savior.

  14. 28 May 2012 at 8:52 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    3canines (Anonymous) says…

    LOL

  15. 28 May 2012 at 10:16 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    haveathought (Anonymous) says…

    I agree a bit with jmed. The reason our political system is nonviable is because there are only two parties. We need a third party to have a more rounded system. Nobody is all Democrat or all Republican. There are more choices out there and we need to vote for them.
    As for Mitt— If we are able to ask questions, then I hope we challenge him and not just stroke his agenda.

  16. 28 May 2012 at 10:37 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    Brian_Kotowski (Anonymous) says…

    jmed:

    I'm glad you're happy to reside out there on the fringe. It means you've exculded yourself any meaningful national policy decisions.

    From Washington-Obama, this country has never elected a President from anything other than one of the two major parties. Ever. The reasons for that have principally to do with the differeces between the two main electoral systems employed by Western representative republics: single-member district pluralities, and proportional representation. It's probably too much to expect Paulians to know which of those is used here, let alone the realities it imposes.

    In all of American history, Roosevelt posted the best 3rd-party Presidential election results, garnering 27.4% of the popular vote in 1912. Ross Perot won 18.9% in 1992, and George Wallace 13.5% in 1968.

    The only time Ron Paul appeared on all 50 General Election Presidential ballots (in 1988), he won 0.47% of the popular vote. THERE'S an electoral juggernaut for ya.

    So I encourage you to write Paul on your November ballot. Support for that nutcase is so anemic, you will have no impact on the election and exert zero influence on the direction of the country.

  17. 30 May 2012 at 5:55 a.m.

    Suggest removal

    Brian_Kotowski (Anonymous) says…

    jmed:

    Romney locked up the nomination last night. Only John Huntsman has fewer delegates than Ron Paul. What is it you see Paul doing with his 129 delegates - now that Romney has 1183?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

This site is best viewed with Spreadfirefox Affiliate Button or the latest version of Internet Explorer